Scan broadly
Automated tools identify detectable patterns across the agreed pages and states.
Web accessibility
Find and remove barriers people actually encounter.
We combine automated checks with manual review of keyboard use, structure, reflow, forms, content, and the human experience of completing important tasks.
Who this is for
A useful fit when the work needs more clarity.
This work is for teams that want practical evidence about accessibility and a correction plan their designers, developers, and content owners can use.
Common signs
This may sound familiar.
- An automated score looks good, but nobody has checked the important journeys by hand.
- Keyboard users can reach a control but cannot tell where focus is.
- Pages pass a scan while instructions, errors, or choices remain hard to understand.
- The team has a list of issues but no shared order for correcting and retesting them.
How we can help
A clear path through the work.
The exact scope depends on the situation. These are the usual parts of the work.
Review important tasks by hand
We test keyboard flow, focus, headings, names, status messages, zoom, reflow, and other experience details.
Explain the consequence
Findings describe who may be affected, how to reproduce the barrier, and why it matters.
Support correction and retesting
We recommend the smallest useful change, then record what passed, what remains, and what still needs human or assistive-technology testing.
What you may receive
Useful material, not just advice.
- A clear record of automated and manual findings
- Severity, affected users, and reproduction steps
- Specific remediation guidance organized by priority
- Retest results and an honest list of remaining limitations
A simple starting point
Start with a short description of the problem.
You can share the goal, the current obstacle, and any deadline that matters. Please keep sensitive material out of the public inquiry.